Post : Testing 30 brands of batteries
URL : http://hackaday.com/2012/09/14/testing-30-brands-of-batteries/
Posted : September 14, 2012 at 7:00 am
Author : Brian Benchoff
Tags : aa, alkaline, battery, cell, lithium, zinc
Categories : hardware

http://hackadaycom.files.wordpress.com/2012/09/batt.jpeg

Batteries come packaged in bright blister packs emblazoned with vague guarantees such as "45% more pictures" and "five times longer lasting." During his internship at BitBox this summer, [Thomas] decided to put those statements to the test. He tested thirty brands of batteries (http://www.batteryshowdown.com/) on a homebrew rig to find the batteries with the most power and the most bang for your buck.

http://www.batteryshowdown.com/results-lo.html

http://www.batteryshowdown.com/results-hi.html

The hardware [Thomas] used an STM32 microcontroller to perform two different tests: a high drain and a low drain condition. For the high drain, 1000 mA were sucked out of the batteries until the voltage reached 0.8 V. For the low drain, 200 mA were used. Data including milliwatt-hours, milliamp-hours, joules, voltage, current, power, and effective load resistance were all logged for both conditions for all 30 batteries.

Generalizing the results for both low and high drain conditions, lithium batteries were better than alkaline, which were both better than zinc AA cells. Perhaps unsurprisingly, batteries marketed as 'long life' and 'extended power' were the worst batteries for the money, but a brand-name battery - the Kodak Xtralife cells - were actually the best value for the money.

Add a comment to this post: http://hackaday.com/2012/09/14/testing-30-brands-of-batteries/#respond

--
WordPress.com | Thanks for flying with WordPress!